UK Aid Plan Bleeds £400 Million as Inflation Eats Into 2027 Target
Inflation and a 2025 policy shift are driving a projected gap that could halve planned reductions in African funding.
By Sophie Costa ·

Four hundred million pounds is the estimated gap between what the UK planned to spend on international aid in 2027 and what it will actually have to spend. New calculations from the Center for Global Development indicate the country will fall short of its self-imposed target of allocating 0.3% of national income to aid.
The researchers analyzed the Treasury's central forecast and found that UK aid spending in 2027 is projected to be £410 million lower than planned. This reduction would bring aid to just 0.29% of national income. The CGD noted that a deeper shortfall of £580 million, or 0.28% of income, is a very plausible outcome. Even the most conservative estimate in their analysis points to a gap of £250 million.
Ian Mitchell, a senior fellow at the CGD and co-director of its Europe programme, described the situation as a material shortfall in the spending power of UK aid. He stated that closing even a £400 million gap would be sufficient to halve the planned cuts to Africa. Mitchell warned that these reductions are likely to cost thousands of lives and effectively amount to a UK exit from the south and east of the continent.
The primary drivers of this gap are economic and policy-based. Inflation has outpaced expectations, meaning national income is larger than it was when the spending review occurred. Additionally, a policy change in 2025 affecting the budget of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office contributed to the decline. The CGD urged ministers to add funds for international aid in this week's budget to avoid the criticism that follows from missing a target.
This 0.3% goal for 2027 sits well below the 0.7% promised in Labour's election manifesto. Prime Minister Keir Starmer lowered the target to free up resources for defence spending. Fleur Anderson, a former minister on the foreign affairs select committee, said she wanted to see higher aid spending in the upcoming budget. She expressed a desire for the government to reverse these cuts in time, but insisted that at the very least, the reduced target should be hit. Anderson noted that falling short is not an abstract accounting issue, pointing to communities without clean water, girls leaving school, undelivered vaccines, and cuts to peace programmes in war zones.
Charities have repeatedly warned that deep aid cuts will damage children's education and raise the risk of disease and death in some African countries. Figures released by the FCDO in September showed that the cuts under Starmer's government hit the world's poorest nations hardest, while higher-income countries received a larger share. Funding to the least-developed and low-income countries fell by 6.7%, or £118 million. The UK's overall official development assistance budget dropped to 0.44% of gross national income in 2025, down from 0.5% in 2024, a fall of £987 million.
The government has prioritized funding through multilateral bodies such as the International Development Association, the World Bank's development arm, and the global vaccines initiative Gavi. It has also maintained humanitarian support. Meanwhile, the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to cut aid from about £9 billion a year to £1 billion, a level that would leave the UK unable to cover its existing contributions to the UN and World Bank.
An FCDO spokesperson said the multi-year aid allocations published in March 2026 set out spending plans and priorities for the next three financial years, based on gross national income at the time of the 2025 spending review. The spokesperson stated that moving to a fixed budget reduces volatility and provides the necessary stability to deliver high-impact aid programmes.
The next step is the budget announcement scheduled for this week. Ministers will need to decide whether to adjust the aid budget to reflect current inflation figures or stick to the fixed amounts determined in 2025. The outcome will determine whether the UK meets its 0.3% target or acknowledges a formal shortfall for the first time in this cycle.
Source: The Guardian





